At Ford Motor Company, we’re going green, and fast. We’re proud to be one of only three companies selected by the U.S. Department of Energy to be approved for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program.
This green relationship with the U.S. government will help us accelerate the development of advanced technologies for even better fuel efficiency and emissions. These are the loans that Congress authorized in conjunction with the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act.
Seventy-five companies applied for these loans. Ford is one of the first automakers deemed by the government to be among the best companies with the best technologies in American manufacturing and fuel efficiency.
We are committed to fuel economy leadership with every new model we introduce. In fact, we are investing nearly $14 billion in advanced technology vehicles in the next seven years alone in the U.S.
Our relationship with the Department of Energy also will help retool our U.S. plants more quickly to produce fuel-efficient vehicles and meet new, rigorous fuel-economy requirements.
We make it easy for you to share this story with your friends; simply click on the “share this” method of your choice just below or at the top right corner of this page. You can also click here to sign up for updates from Ford Motor Company, and click here to add an RSS feed to your regular homepage.












35 Comments
June 23, 2009 at 10:48 pm
June 24, 2009 at 11:08 pm
The program was instituted by the U.S. government in December of 2007 after CAFE standards were raised to a point that imposed $114 billion in costs on automakers. The $25 billion program is the government's effort to offset that cost and to work in partnership - not receivership - with companies that have a plan for addressing fuel efficiency needs.
Scott Monty
Global Digital Communications
Ford Motor Company
June 27, 2009 at 6:07 pm
June 30, 2009 at 2:10 pm
July 9, 2009 at 7:56 pm
June 23, 2009 at 11:28 pm
It has , i presume, less moving parts. The why it should be more expensive than usual gasoline car ?
June 24, 2009 at 8:43 am
i love sped
i need this car
June 24, 2009 at 1:10 pm
June 25, 2009 at 12:03 pm
June 25, 2009 at 12:07 pm
June 26, 2009 at 1:47 pm
I am 100% against loaning the big three anything unless they are willing to get in the real game…
Unlike us, the ‘off shore‘car building culture is to:
-FIRST query the customer for a ‘wish book’
-and then create a product that meets or beats the wish book input.
I am a ‘die-hard’ American… but the big three in this country don’t have a clue. I offer a challenge to the American Automotive design community. Go to Avis and rent a Nissan Altma hybrid, drive it one hundred miles and then try to build something competitive. I wanted to try a hybrid and this was my choice. They will find a car that rides like a Caddy STS, performs like a Pontiac G6, at 80 all it wants to do is ‘go faster’, Interior about the size of a mid sized Fusion, and at the end of my one hundred mile adventure took a whole 2.3 gal of gas to top it off. And, to add icing to the cake this automobile had all of the amities including GPS and has an ‘out the door’ price of under 34K. American engineering puts us in a lead position in the space program yet we are not even in the ‘chase’ when it comes to hybrid competition
June 26, 2009 at 7:17 pm
December 7, 2009 at 11:25 pm
MADE ENTIRELY IN HERMISILLO, MEXICO.
PUT SOME AMERICANS BACK TO WORK! IF IT COMES TO BUYING A JAPANESE OR A MEXICAN CAR I WILL BUY AN AMERICAN CHEVY VOLT!
June 30, 2009 at 2:05 pm
July 15, 2009 at 9:09 am
November 28, 2009 at 3:51 pm
However you will notice that's the reverse of the predicted EPA mileage. It would take a miracle to engage the electric motor at 40mph. The local dealer is not knowledgeable about the exact operation of the hybrid and I want to assure myself that the computer is properly functioning when it calls for the electric motor. (It might indicate you should be soft pedaling the high speed operation in hybrid mode). The standard Ford communications method keeps the true experts behind a curtain. Is there anyone I could talk to by E-mail who could educate me?
November 30, 2009 at 8:59 pm
Praveen Cherian
Ford Motor Company
July 3, 2009 at 3:18 am
June 26, 2009 at 7:13 pm
June 29, 2009 at 12:00 am
June 29, 2009 at 6:50 am
Be going to all electric as well? It would make Edison happy!
June 29, 2009 at 10:15 am
The prize winning Ford Reflex elec/diesel - Best of Show in Detroit 2 yrs ago --120mph/60 mpg - where is it ??? Ford Flex? We want yesterday''s best
European diesel! How about putting up that picture of the Ford Reflex doing
a burnout on stage? THAT"S green enough for me!
June 30, 2009 at 12:48 pm
June 30, 2009 at 2:51 pm
July 6, 2009 at 9:50 pm
What would make all the high prices of parts, to make a car, go away? Is it because of Trade agreements not allowing the U.S. to get less expensive products from abroad?
The World should be together on this people, let everyone get a piece of the Patent Pie.
Or we'll be forced to use Toyota's technology, and be priced up the Ying Yang for it.
We don't wish to kill our planet for greed. What will you do with the profits if the planet explodes? Offshore accounts?
July 8, 2009 at 11:33 am
July 10, 2009 at 7:32 pm
July 14, 2009 at 5:01 pm
1. The cost of gas in Europe (uk anyhow) is so high that it is the major cost of owning a vehicle. Gas has been taxed so highly that it is only 10% cheaper than diesel - in the USA the difference is closer to 20-25%, so you have to get 20% more mpg just to reach breakeven.
2. The cost of the cars in Europe is higher (once again, in the UK anyhow), so the price difference for a diesel car is less in % terms.
There's other things that i see people frequently make mistakes on:
1. The gallon is a different size. The UK gallon is 1/7th larger, so you're going to get 14% better mpg just 'cos you're using different units. Never mind the fact that they don't even use gallons anymore!
2. The mpg rating tests are different in different countries. Comparing an EU efficiency, or a japanese one to a US one is not valid.
I find it really weird that i hardly ever hear these points raised in explaining away at least some of the bad perception of American cars.
One other point that i think should be raised is the road systems themselves. There's a pretty big difference between how often you hit a stop sign or red light in the US and the UK. In the UK it seems the lights are phased a lot better, and there's extensive use of roundabouts. Over here, in the US, (at least around San Diego) there's new stop lights and stop signs all over the place. You spend half your time waiting at red lights and there's not even anyone else from the opposing direction. I would think fixing this stuff would be way more cost effective than scrapping old cars that people likely aren't driving anyhow.
Anyhow - just my perspective on some points i feel that people often overlook.
July 15, 2009 at 6:24 am
July 15, 2009 at 7:41 am
I don't know if a lot of you know but the electric grid is over 90% dependent on burning fossil fuels...coal. Last I checked its not exactly a renewable resource. If and whenever more plug in hybrids and electric cars hit the grids overnight we'll be able to thank those owners for increasing electricity costs...as if people aren't complaining about electricity costs NOW.
July 20, 2009 at 5:02 am
September 24, 2009 at 12:14 am
October 13, 2009 at 8:55 am
November 9, 2009 at 11:20 pm
February 22, 2010 at 1:48 pm
Companies like Baker Motor Vehicle of Cleveland marketed directly to those 'city drivers.' Baker presented its Electric Stanhope as 'dainty, immaculately clean, full of good service, durable, simple to operate, and always ready to go...ideal for city use.' The Electric Stanhope quickly became the nation's most popular battery-powered vehicle after its introduction in 1900. This 1903 model originally retailed for $1,600 and is a typical example of the electric car at the height of its popularity.
Add Your Comment