As the industry advanced in plug-in electric vehicle technology, Ford Motor Company brings is developing an intelligent vehicle-to-grid communications and control system for these vehicles that “talks” directly with the nation’s electric grid. The advantage of this technology is that it allows the vehicle operator to program when to recharge the vehicle, for how long and at what utility rate.
“Electric vehicles are an important element of our strategy for improving fuel economy and reducing CO2 emissions,” said Bill Ford, Ford’s executive chairman. “This vehicle-to-grid communication technology is an important step in the journey toward the widespread commercialization of electric vehicles.”
All 21 of Ford’s fleet of plug-in hybrid Escapes eventually will be equipped with the vehicle-to-grid communications technology. The first of the specially equipped plug-in hybrids has been delivered to American Electric Power of Columbus, Ohio. Ford’s other utility partners’ vehicles will also be equipped with the communications technology.
When plugged in, the battery systems of these specially equipped plug-in hybrids can communicate directly with the electrical grid via smart meters provided by utility companies through wireless networking. The owner uses the vehicle’s touch screen navigation interface and Ford Work Solutions in-dash computer to choose when the vehicle should recharge, for how long and at what utility rate.
For example, a vehicle owner could choose to accept a charge only during off-peak hours between midnight and 6 a.m. when electricity rates are cheaper, or when the grid is using only renewable energy such as wind or solar power.
This new technology builds on Ford’s advancements such as SYNC®, SmartGaugeTM with EcoGuide and Ford Work SolutionsTM.
We make it easy for you to share this story with your friends; simply click on the “share this” method of your choice just below or at the top right corner of this page. You can also click here to sign up for updates from Ford Motor Company, and click here to add an RSS feed to your regular homepage.












32 Comments
August 25, 2009 at 4:16 am
How close is availability? Are we getting any where near full production of hybric vehicles?
August 26, 2009 at 10:08 pm
October 15, 2009 at 11:05 pm
August 28, 2009 at 12:26 pm
September 18, 2009 at 11:04 pm
November 14, 2009 at 1:57 pm
November 21, 2009 at 7:03 pm
December 15, 2009 at 5:58 pm
December 17, 2009 at 7:46 pm
December 21, 2009 at 5:42 pm
September 20, 2009 at 3:52 pm
September 21, 2009 at 7:36 am
September 23, 2009 at 11:36 pm
September 26, 2009 at 10:22 pm
September 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm
September 24, 2009 at 5:54 am
September 23, 2009 at 5:36 pm
October 13, 2009 at 11:01 pm
September 24, 2009 at 10:42 pm
September 25, 2009 at 3:43 am
September 25, 2009 at 8:04 am
You know how there are so many different charging cords for laptops and cell phones? We want to avoid this for vehicles. We need a single standard. And that takes time. We're working in partnership with suppliers, nonprofits, think tanks, utility companies and the Department of Energy to ensure that the vehicles we produce will be effectively supported by the entire infrastructure, from building to driving to maintaining.
More information on our plans and partners is available at:
http://ford.digitalsnippets.com/electrification/
Scott Monty
Global Digital Communications
Ford Motor Company
September 25, 2009 at 5:07 am
Earlier in the year we had a delivery van explode while they were refilling it. Put 3 people in the hospital. And the Fire Departments hate these vehicles. Nothing worse than going up to a burning car and having it explode. The hot metal is ripped apart and the pieces scatter some 100-200 feet, including the tank itself. Do a google search. And these tanks, when they do work have many tough issues (other than blowing up). They are pressurized, so on hotter days you don't get a good fill. As you fill them, even on a cold day, they heat up as you pump compressed gas in. To actually "Fill" the tank would involve filling it up, waiting 10-15 minutes for the tank to cool and then topping it off. Lather, rinse, repeat. And the tanks have a limited life, at which point the vehicle owner has to replace the tank with a new one, at great expense. When was the last time you bought a new gas tank for your car? Me? Never. And the worst dirty little secret of them all? The bifuel CNG vehicles require you to burn one tank of DIRTY GASOLINE each month! So even if you only wanted to use just CNG you can't. You must burn at least 12 tankfuls a year of evil gasoline.
But then the proponents of alternate energy sources rarely mention the Inconvenient Truths about the technologies that are far from perfect. They only mention the positive issues. Never a balanced discussion.
These vehicles were discontinued by Ford in late 2003-4. Right when they redesigned the most popular vehicle on the planet, the F-150. There is no CNG version of the last two generations of the F-150, it's gone the way of the EV-1. Even the GAS COMPANY is now purchasing gasoline powered trucks to use in their fleet. I saw one just the other day. No CNG for the new Gas companies vehicles.
Let the marketplace dictate which fuel I choose to use to get around, and how much I will spend. It's called Freedom. You remember that don't you, fellow Americans?
September 30, 2009 at 11:42 pm
Thank goodness for freedom. It allows me to drive my CNG car every day, and love it every day. I am intrigued by Hybrids and Electrics, but in the meantime I pay $0.96/gallon for fuel, and have many other advantages from a near zero emissions vehicle.
BTW, I am not sure where you got that info about tanks needing to be replaced. I am sure there are some exceptions, but as a long time CNG driver well versed in the technology, I can assure you that isn't the rule.
September 25, 2009 at 10:26 am
September 30, 2009 at 10:25 pm
My wife will be needing to replace her car soon but right now it's either going to be a Prius or a VW Jetta TDI.
October 6, 2009 at 6:02 am
October 1, 2009 at 9:27 am
October 1, 2009 at 10:22 pm
When can we expect to see a car that can mostly charge itself?
November 22, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Second question (while I have your attention): I have an 1989 Merkur Scorpio (among other vehicles) and cannot get parts any more. It is a shame. Ford stopped supporting this in the US many years ago but there are still parts available in Europe - it is just impossible to connect with the parts network there. I believe the ultimate conservation position is to not discard cars every few years and throw them away like garbage. The car has been maintained very well, it runs well and gets 25 mpg on the highway - better than most cars of its size even today. Why generate all of the additional carbon/energy footprints to replace this car when only a part is needed? Can you help? Is there anyone at Ford who cares? Is there anyone at Ford who understands that in addition to the green technology revolution, another part of the entire conservation movement is to take great care of the few things we buy and maintain them in good working order?
November 22, 2009 at 11:54 pm
As for your second question - I have to defer until I can check into that one. I don't have an answer at the moment...sounds like a real testament to the Merkur that its running 21 years later -
November 24, 2009 at 10:57 am
February 7, 2010 at 1:07 pm
It is limited in charging ability and sells for over $6,450, plus installation. Do you have an
alternative? We propose to establish EV Islands, that offer recharging, plus using solar
and wind to generate some elect. to help control some of our costs. We have 15 years
experience with NG vehicles and Propane vehicles. We could offer these at the same
islands. Our Solar panels look like Patio covers, and are very cosmetic. The Wind
Tubines while producing very small amounts of electricty, attract attention and show
where we are going "Green" any input and suggestions? I read about the device
that Ford plans to put on each engine to adjust time for charging, timing to cut
costs, etc, would this put us out of business? Bob Lynch SAE since 1990
Energy Engineer, 15 years.Thinking out of diapers, 75 years.
Add Your Comment